Jest Runner
Installation
Install @stryker-mutator/jest-runner locally within your project folder, like so:
npm i --save-dev @stryker-mutator/jest-runner
# OR
yarn add --dev @stryker-mutator/jest-runner
Peer dependencies
The @stryker-mutator/jest-runner is a plugin for Stryker to enable Jest as a test runner. As such, you should make sure you have the correct versions of its dependencies installed:
- jest
- @stryker-mutator/core
For the minimum supported versions, see the peerDependencies section in the package.json.
Configuration
Make sure you set the testRunner
option to "jest".
{
"testRunner": "jest"
}
The @stryker-mutator/jest-runner also provides a couple of configurable options using the jest
property in your Stryker config:
{
"jest": {
"projectType": "custom",
"configFile": "path/to/your/custom/jestConfig.js",
"config": {
"testEnvironment": "jest-environment-jsdom-sixteen"
},
"enableFindRelatedTests": true
}
}
jest.projectType
["string"
]
Default: "custom"
Configure where jest should get its configuration from.
"custom"
: use thejest.config
custom configuration."create-react-app"
: use react-scripts, for projects created with create-react-app."create-react-app-ts"
: DEPRECATED use react-scripts-ts, for projects created with create-react-app-typescript. DEPRECATED, please follow the migration guide and move tocreate-react-app
.
jest.configFile
[string
]
Default: undefined
The path to your Jest config file of package.json file containing in the "jest"
key. By default, the @stryker-mutator/jest-runner will try to look for "jest.conf.js" or "package.json" in the current working directory.
jest.config
[object
]
Default: undefined
Custom Jest config. This will override file-based config.
jest.enableFindRelatedTests
[boolean
]
Default: true
Whether to run jest with the --findRelatedTests
flag. When true
, Jest will only run tests related to the mutated file per test. (See --findRelatedTests).
ECMAScript Modules
Jest ships with support for ECMAScript Modules (ESM). In order to provide the --experimental-vm-modules
node option, you will need to add this to your stryker.conf.json file:
{
"testRunnerNodeArgs": ["--experimental-vm-modules"]
}
Coverage analysis
The @stryker-mutator/jest-runner
plugin supports coverage analysis and test filtering, meaning you can run with --coverageAnalysis perTest
for optimal performance.
Coverage reporting
When using "all"
or "perTest"
coverage analysis, this plugin reports mutant coverage by hooking into the jest's test environment. The test environment setting in your configuration file is overridden by default and you won't have to do anything here.
However, if you choose to override the jest-environment on a file-by-file basis using jest's @jest-environment
docblock, you will have to do the work.
This:
/**
* @jest-environment jsdom
*/
Becomes:
/**
* @jest-environment @stryker-mutator/jest-runner/jest-env/jsdom
*/
This is the list of jest environments that are shipped with @stryker-mutator/jest-runner.
Jest test environment | @stryker-mutator/jest-runner override |
---|---|
node | @stryker-mutator/jest-runner/jest-env/node |
jsdom | @stryker-mutator/jest-runner/jest-env/jsdom |
jest-environment-jsdom-sixteen | @stryker-mutator/jest-runner/jest-env/jsdom-sixteen |
Don't worry; using Stryker's alternative is harmless during regular unit testing.
If you're using a custom test environment, you'll need to mixin the Stryker functionality yourself:
// my-custom-jest-environment.js
const { mixinJestEnvironment } = require('@stryker-mutator/jest-runner');
const { TestEnvironment } = require('jest-environment-node');
// const TestEnvironment = require('jest-environment-node'); // 👈 [email protected] or lower
class MyCustomTestEnvironment extends TestEnvironment {
// custom magic here ✨
}
module.exports = mixinJestEnvironment(MyCustomTestEnvironment);
Test filtering
When using "perTest"
coverage analysis, the @stryker-mutator/jest-runner
will hook into the jest test runner. Both "jasmine2"
as well as jest-circus
(default) are supported here.
If you're using a different test runner, you're out of luck. Please downgrade to using "all"
coverage analysis. If you think we should support your test runner, please let us know by opening an issue, or by joining our slack channel.